Civil Lawsuits

Internet Crimes

Alabama Internet Crime Attorneys with a National and International Reach

Defending clients accused of complex computer crimes – Boles Holmes White

Many of the opportunities related to the internet are new. As a result, many of the laws governing the internet are also new and poorly defined. In addition, accusations of internet crime may be particularly intricate due to the complex laws related to new media. Many times, issues of jurisdiction may also complicate cases: local, state, federal and even international bodies may become involved with internet criminal investigations.

New media territory for identity theft and other financial crimes involving the internet

Whatever the accusation you may be facing, your best chance at securing your freedom, avoiding large fines, and defending your rights may be to seek out an accomplished legal professional with experience in internet law and computer crime. Your case may even involve international law and accusations of International Crime. Some of the most common crimes involving the internet are:

  • Computer hacking
  • Child pornography
  • Cyber stalking
  • Fraud including credit card fraud
  • Gambling
  • Identity theft
  • Illegal downloading
  • Phishing or social engineering
  • Solicitation

If you are being investigated for any of the above, an experienced and diligent criminal defense attorney can help protect your rights. We may be able to keep you from prison, keep you from paying retribution, and keep your reputation from being tarnished.  Contact Boles Holmes White to discuss your legal options.

Internet criminal defense requires a law firm with specialized skills and vast resources.

Internet crime is one of the many areas in which Boles Holmes White have experience. And like all of the areas in which we practice, no matter how complicated, challenging, or improbable success in your case may seem, our Alabama internet crime attorneys can help. All of our resources will be committed defending you against accusations of wrongdoing. If your case goes to trial, we will aggressively fight for acquittal.  However, our experience suggests that we may be able to get charges dropped and clear your name far before a trial is necessary.

Contact Boles Holmes White to discuss your many legal options related to internet crime. No matter the challenges of your case, we are well qualified to defend your rights.

Federal Cases
Charges
Verdict
USA vs. Edwards
Tax Evasion
Probation
USA vs.McLemore
Government Benefits Fraud
Probation
USA vs. Smith
Wire Fraud, Mail Fraud, Honest Services Fraud, Bribery, Federal Programs Fraud, Money Laundering
NOT Guilty All 19 Counts
USA vs. Dyer
Bank Fraud
Negotiated Plea to Probation
USA vs. Scrushy
36 Counts Conspiracy Wire Fraud Mail Fraud Sarbanes-Oakley Money Laundering
NOT Guilty on All Counts
USA vs. Conn
Wire Fraud Federal Contract Fraud
Negotiated Plea to Probation
USA vs. Abercrombie
Theft of Government Funds
Negotiated Plea to Probation
USA vs. Grimes
Wire Fraud
NOT Guilty
USA vs. Nemish
Bank Fraud
NOT Guilty
USA vs. Phillips
Bank Fraud
Reduced
USA vs. Bond and Benefield
Rackateering Wire Fraud Conspiracy
1 Year Probation Dismissed on Government motion
USA vs. Johnson
Theft
NOT Guilty
USA vs. Mershon
Wire Fraud
Charges Dismissed
USA vs. Johnson
Government Fraud
NOT Guilty
USA vs. Khan
Interstate Terrorist Threat
Dismissed
USA vs. Taaid
Eastern District of Michigan Healthcare Fraud
Negotiated Plea
USA vs. Lam
Tuscon, Arizona Largest U.S. Counterfeit Case
Negotiated Plea
USA vs. Kennedy
Mail Fraud Money Laundering
Diversion
State Cases
Charges
Verdict
State vs. Khan
Arson
NOT Guilty
State vs. Moore
Theft of Property I
NOT Guilty
State vs. Alderman
Theft of Property I
NOT Guilty
State vs. Kilpatrick
Conspiracy Perjury
Plea to Obstruction of Justice
Theft Cases
Charges
Verdict
State v. Griffin
Bribery
Hung Jury (twice)
State v. Uber
Theft by Deception
NOT Guilty
State v. Berry
Possession of Forged Instrument 1st
NOT Guilty
State v. Graham
Theft of Property – 7 counts
NOT Guilty all counts
State v. Herring
Theft of Property – 30 misdemeanor counts
NOT Guilty all counts
State v. Woodham
Theft
Dismissed
State v. Eriksson
Embezzlement
Mistrial
State v. Whitley
Receiving Stolen Property with numerous priors

Negotiated Plea

Speak to an Attorney

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Other Personal Practice Areas

Civil Lawsuits >