Zohydro Arrests

The Controversial History of Zohydro

A New Hydrocodone-based Painkiller Approved by the FDA in the fall of 2013, Zohydro is an extended-release formulation of the painkiller hydrocodone. Unlike other such drugs on the market, Zohydro contains no acetaminophen or similar additives, a fact which manufacturer Zogenix claims can make it safer than the alternatives. Zohydro’s approval process, however, was contentious. In contrast to the modern version of OxyContin, Zohydro incorporates nothing in the way of abuse-deterring features. That spurred many experts to warn that the new drug would lead to dangerous levels of illegitimate use and outright abuse. Fearing an upcoming wave of zohydro addiction, law enforcement officials and public health authorities around the country rallied against the drug throughout the process, and the FDA’s own advisory panel voted 11-2 against approving it for the same reason. Even after Zohydro was given the green light, 28 state attorneys general banded together to petition the FDA to reverse its decision, an effort that ultimately proved fruitless.

The Enforcement Environment Surrounding Zohydro in Alabama Today

Law enforcement officials at all levels, then, have been on guard against the new prescription drug since even before it became available. Having struggled for so long against the abuse and illegal distribution of OxyContin, problems that are only now coming under control thanks to a new formulation, police and prosecutors in Alabama are determined to fight aggressively against the abuse of Zohydro to ensure that it does not snowball in the same way. That means that anyone who is the subject of a zohydro arrest in Alabama can expect to face forceful prosecution. Being able to rely on an experienced drug crimes defense attorney, like those of Boles Holmes White LLC, will therefore be practically a necessity for accused persons who wish to minimize the damage done to their lives and futures. Prosecutors in Alabama are determined to move strongly against those accused even of simple unauthorized zohydro possession and will be even tougher on people suspected of illegal distribution.

Experienced and Dedicated, Boles Holmes White Drug Crimes Attorneys Fight Effectively for Their Clients

Facing down aggressive, determined police and prosecutors, the average defendant stands little chance of escaping unscathed. Prosecuting Zohydro cases is a high priority across Alabama, meaning that little in the way of resources and time will be spared in the effort to put accused persons behind bars. Boles Holmes White criminal defense attorneys are experienced at protecting their clients and giving them the effective representation they need. Many drug crime prosecutions are rife with overreach on the part of police and prosecutors, and Boles Holmes White attorneys are experienced at rooting out and exposing these problematic, rights-violating tactics. Attorneys with Boles Holmes White who are experienced at defending drug charges, for example, can quickly recognize when an investigating officer has overstepped the bounds of the law, and these insights can quickly produce results for clients. Boles Holmes White criminal defense attorneys are also adept at anticipating the strategies of prosecutors, understanding and accounting for their moves, both inside and out of the courtroom, in ways that maximize clients’ chances. With the Stakes so High, Securing the Best Possible Representation is of Critical Importance Boles Holmes White attorneys also understand at a deep level, borne of extensive experience, how serious and important these matters invariably are. A single zohydro arrest can impact a life in negative ways for a long time to come, and Boles Holmes White attorneys fight fiercely to ensure that their clients do not suffer unnecessarily. A charge of possession of Zohydro without a prescription can entail potential penalties of years in state prison and fines of up to $15,000. Those charged with trafficking or distribution face even harsher punishments, and felony convictions of any sort in Alabama entail the lifelong loss of a number of important rights and enduring difficulties with finding employment, as well as other issues. Prosecutors will try to push those accused of Zohydro crimes to plead guilty even when their cases are weak, and having the counsel of an experienced, effective defense attorney like those of Boles Holmes White is often the only way of avoiding this trap.

Effective Help for Those Who Have Already Been Convicted

With prosecutors and police officers focused so intently on putting Zohydro abusers and traffickers behind bars, shortcuts, civil rights violations, and other issues are commonplace. Boles Holmes White attorneys can review the cases of those who have already been convicted to find grounds for appeals, and these efforts are often successful. Whether facing Zohydro-related charges for the first time, then, or dealing with the impact of a conviction, getting in touch with Boles Holmes White to talk about what can be done is an important step. As long as authorities in Alabama remain so committed to fighting Zohydro abuse, anyone who falls afoul of their focus will benefit from having determined, experienced counsel.

Federal Cases
Charges
Verdict
USA vs. Casper
Armed Career Criminal
NOT Guilty
USA vs. Merritt
Felon in Possession of Firearm
Dismissed
USA vs. White
Drug Conspiracy
Dismissed
USA vs. Williams
Distribution Marijuana/Conspiracy
Dismissed
USA vs. Luther
Theft of Explosives
Dissmissed
USA vs. Connell
Convicted Felon in Possession of Firearm Possession of Unregistered Firearm
NOT Guilty on Both Counts
USA vs. Lee
DUI – Federal Property
Dismissed on Government Motion
USA vs. Simmons
Continuing Criminal Enterprises – Drugs KingPin Cocaine and Marijuana
Verdict to less than 100 kilograms of Marijuana
USA vs. Smith
Wire Fraud Mail Fraud Honest Services Fraud Bribery Federal Programs Fraud Money Laundering
NOT Guilty on All 19 Counts
USA vs. Dyer
Bank Fraud
Negotiated Plea to Probation
USA vs. Scrushy
36 Counts Conspiracy Wire Fraud Mail Fraud Sarbanes-Oakley Money Laundering
NOT Guilty on All Counts
USA vs. Conn
Wire Fraud Federal Contract Fraud
Negotiated Plea to Probation
USA vs. Abercrombie
Theft of Government Funds
Negotiated Plea to Probation
USA vs. Grimes
Wire Fraud
NOT Guilty
USA vs. Nemish
Bank Fraud
NOT Guilty
USA vs. Phillips
Bank Fraud
Reduced
USA vs. Bond and Benefield
Rackateering Wire Fraud Conspiracy
1 Year Probation Dismissed on Government motion
USA vs. Johnson
Theft
NOT Guilty
USA vs. Mershon
Wire Fraud
Charges Dismissed
USA vs. Johnson
Government Fraud
NOT Guilty
USA vs. Khan
Interstate Terrorist Threat
Dismissed
USA vs. Taaid
Eastern District of Michigan Healthcare Fraud
Negotiated Plea
USA vs. Lam
Tuscon, Arizona Largest U.S. Counterfeit Case
Negotiated Plea
USA vs. Kennedy
Mail Fraud Money Laundering
Diversion
State Cases
Charges
Verdict
State vs. Mayes
UPCS
NOT Guilty
State vs. Mayes
UDCS
NOT Guilty
State vs. Johnston
Robbery I
Reduced to Robbery II
State vs. Johnson
Robbery I Making Terrorist Threats Dog/Cat Cruelty Menacing
Reduced to Robbery III NOT Guilty NOT Guilty NOT Guilty
State vs. Khan
Arson
NOT Guilty
State vs. Moore
Theft of Property I
NOT Guilty
State vs. Alderman
Theft of Property I
NOT Guilty
State vs. Kilpatrick
Conspiracy Perjury
Plea to Obstruction of Justice
Murder/Manslaughter Cases
Charges
Verdict
State v. Jones
Assault I
NOT Guilty on 2 Counts
State v. Brogden
Capital Murder (Prosecuted by Alabama Attorney General’s Office)
NOT Guilty
State v. Morris
Murder – 2 Counts Assault – 2 Counts
NOT Guilty on ALL Counts
State v. Corbitt
Murder
NOT Guilty
State v. Coskrey
Murder
NOT Guilty
State v. Vinson
Murder
NOT Guilty
State v. Dean
Murder
NOT Guilty
State v. Cobb

Murder
NOT Guilty
State v. Segars

Murder
NOT Guilty
State v. Garrison

Murder
NOT Guilty
State v. Holland

Murder – 2 Counts
NOT Guilty
State v. Brewer

Murder
Manslaughter
State v. Clark

Murder
Manslaughter
State v. Patterson

Murder
Hung Jury
State v. Melton

Manslaughter
NOT Guilty
State v. Rogers

Manslaughter
NOT Guilty
State v. Floyd


Manslaughter
NOT Guilty
State v. Dumas

Attempted Murder
Assault II(1 year split) (Plea offer after close of State’s case
State v. Jackson

Capital Murder
Reduced to manslaughter Sentence 2 1/2 years
State v. Daniels

Conspiracy to Commit Murder
NOT Guilty
State v. Curry

Attempted Murder
Dismissed
State v. Westover

Manslaughter
NOT Guilty
Robbery/Firearm Cases
Charges
Verdict
State v. Mauldin
Armed Robbery
Dismissed
State v. Scott
Armed Robbery
Dismissed
State v. Speller
Shooting into Occupied Dwelling
NOT Guilty
State v. Clark

Gun Charge
NOT Guilty
State v. Nelson

Burglary I
NOT Guilty
Drug Cases
Charges
Verdict
State v. Patterson

Trafficking
NOT Guilty
State v. Lloyd

Trafficking
Dismissed
State v. Free
Trafficking Manufacturing Precursor Chemicals Possession
NOT Guilty NOT Guilty NOT Guilty Guilty
State v. Richardson

Trafficking
Plea to Possession
State v. Goodson

Distribution
Administrative Fine
State v. Ready

Distribution
NOT Guilty
State v. Correa

Distribution
Hung Jury (Plea to Possession)
State v. Butts

Conspiracy to Distribute Cocaine and Marijuana
Dismissed
State v. Odum

Precursor Chemicals
Misdemeanor
State v. Lynn

Possession
NOT Guilty
State v. Osborne

Possession
NOT Guilty
State v. Lynn

Possession
NOT Guilty
State v. Stephens

Possession
NOT Guilty
State v. Stephens

Possession
NOT Guilty
State v. Gray

Manufacturing
Dismissed
State v. Wallace

Trafficking
Dismissed
Theft Cases
Charges
Verdict
State v. Uber
Theft by Deception
NOT Guilty
State v. Berry
Possession of Forged Instrument 1st
NOT Guilty
State v. Graham
Theft of Property – 7 counts
NOT Guilty all counts
State v. Herring
Theft of Property – 30 misdemeanor counts
NOT Guilty all counts
State v. Woodham
Theft
Dismissed
State v. Whitley
Receiving Stolen Property With numerous priors
Negotiated
State v. Eriksson
Embezzlement
Mistrial
State v. Griffin
Bribery
Hung Jury (twice)

Speak to an Attorney

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Other Personal Practice Areas

Civil Lawsuits >